In this post, I am sharing the current position of Forefront Client Security (Forefront Endpoint Protection) and Forefront Protection for Exchange in the market, in comparison to similar solutions from other competitors.
1. Forefront Client Security:
We have very high comparative ratings from VirusBulletin – which does independent testing of antivirus solutions.
Below: Average result of multiple tests between August 2009 to February 2010.
How to interpret this chart: Higher reactive AND proactive detection is good. MS Forefront Client Security/Endpoint Protection is place HIGHER than Symantec and McAfee, among other competitors. Trend Micro does not seem to be included in the latest study, but it failed 3 previous tests and didn’t make it in the chart.
2. Forefront Protection for Exchange Server
VirusBulletin, which conducts independent benchmarking of antivirus & antispam products has rated Microsoft Forefront Protection for Exchange highly. MS Forefront for Exchange won the VBspam award consistently. For more information register at virusbtn.com and view the reports.
How to interpret the chart: HIGH SPAM CATCH rate (SC) and LOW FALSE POSITIVE (FP) rate is good.
The latest March 2010 report (below) shows the MS forefront has the HIGHEST SPAM CATCH RATE (SC), while at the same time maintaining relatively LOWER FALSE POSITIVE (FP) compared Symantec, McAfee, McAfee and other popular anti spam solutions.
It is worth noting that what goes into Forefront Protection for SharePoint and Forefront Protection for OCS is the same set of antivirus engines that goes into Forefront Protection for Exchange.